Anorexia Nervosa cannot be satisfactorily accounted for by any single model of abnormality

Anorexia is a condition repugn by psychologists in attempts to find a cause for the hassle. Anorexia is when an exclusive chooses to emaciate themselves in order to be smooth. There be two chief(prenominal) types of argumentation quarter such behaviour. The biological and psychological explanation. Of course, thither argon m every a(prenominal) melodys of branched kayoed explanations within these, and the two of which that I shall be exploring atomic number 18 the genic justification (in damage of biological) and the behaviourist get down, for the psychological relation.Biological psychologists c one timeptualise that human behaviour and what makes us do what we do, is all down to genes. With the new expel in recent science, genes are bonny a more popular driveing to many psychological issues. Anorexia nervosa for angiotensin-converting enzyme. The genetic approach proclaims that the cause for anorexia is to do with genes i.e. the genetic and ancestral factors we have within our relations. The idea is that should one family member suffer from an alimentation disorder, wherefore on that point is a higher go on that other family member (preferably those who share the similar, or like genes) would contract an take in, or another obsessive-compulsive disorder.Holland et al, a group of psychologists, play a study on the genetic tie of anorexia nervosa in 1984. They perused a prove of 34 pairs of couple ons and one raise of triplets, where at least one twin in each pair suffered from anorexia. They engraft a higher concordance direct of 55% for the 16 monozygotic twin (who share 100% of the same genes) than for the 14 pairs of dizygotic twins, (who share 50% of the same genes) with a concordance rate of exclusively 7%. The results, in imprecise terms, suggested that there was a genetic link betwixt family members suffering from anorexia nervosa.But on c draw back examination of the study, we muckle find many other reasons, whic h whitethorn not be genetic, for these findings. For example, the sample amount was very miniature. This is a major flaw in any experiment, as the sample size a ripe deal needs to a representative size, which can be extended to the whole of society, except 35 pairs of twins is an extremely small amount. Furthermore, the environmental influences were not considered in this experiment, and so the higher concordance rates for the monozygotic twins could be because they are handle more alike than the dizygotic twins. This is man of behaviourism of which I shall study ulterior on.In terms of reasonability, the genetic link between family members suffering from anorexia seems to be weak. though it can be part of the reason or possibly only close for only a very few, it cannot be wholly responsible for everyone who suffers from this eating disorder.A problem with this cogitate as macrocosm the answer is that there is then(prenominal) no blame of self. Because the condition is purely biological, the individual is then rendered hopeless and vulnerable to the disorder, as they are not in control of what is in their genes. It can also provide an excuse so that the subject is unable, or unwilling to induce better.Psychologically, behaviourists look at how the environment and removed influences have shaped and created an individual. Predominantly in western cultures, the size of hit in terms of celebrity and media has dramatically fall in the last couple of decades. Marilyn Monroe, verbalize to be one of the most exquisite woman of the time was a ready size 14. As the years departed by, we find that the dress size of beauty has gone down, and now, catwalk models are size 8s and lower. It seems that the more rich and advanced we become, the higher our standards are, for skinnier plurality.The media is a major factor in influencing the customary people of our society. Behaviourists believe that this is one of the main causes for people (particularly th ose with lower self-esteem) to develop eating disorders, in order to become more like the person in the magazine.Because of this, people are often seen as beautiful when they are thin. This puts pressure on people who perhaps may have been teased and felt self-conscious about their self-image. Once the individual begins to lose system of weights, it is often found that the comment stops, and compliments are received in its place. This can then become a habit, and is known as Classical teach. They learn to associate being thin with savor good about themselves. operative conditioning happens when the praise and admiration from others reinforces their eating habits and causes them to want to lose more weight.This form of explanation is very logical in certain aspects, but there are a few things that, should this theory be unbent, does not correspond appropriately. For example, once the diseased person begins to lose similarly much weight and is then the cause for concern, wher efore is it that once the compliments stop, the sufferer compose desires to lose weight? The compliments were associated to feeling good and losing weight. The compliments are no long-run there, and so one would assume the feeling good should have dissolved, and due to operative conditioning, the sufferer would learn to break the habit. It is lawful that operant does several(prenominal)times work on promoting weight gain in some people, by if this concept was accurate, then why doesnt everyone with anorexia respond in the same flair?Anorexia Nervosa cannot be satisfactorily accounted for by any single model of abnormalityIt is true that anorexia cannot be the result of one cause, as we have looked at two versions of reasoning behind the condition and both explanations still leave gaps where logic or stead does not fit. Each explanation gives a valid justification to anorexia, but the problem still cannot be solved by one account of psychology. The answer may be that it is a m ixture of perhaps several models of abnormality, but the fact is that anorexia nervosa is too complex and too different in every case to be the simulacrum of one explanation.