Effect of Economic Crisis Towards Politics in Malaysia

We provoke discussed the impact of sparingal crisis towards economy and social. But thither are some other consequences receivable to this subject. One of them is semi governmental. Malaysia is practicing the democratic system which wholly eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect t successor lives. country ein truthows passel to participate equally either directly or d whiz elected representatives in the proposal, development, and creation oflaws (Roberts, H. Cox. 2012) However, the stinting crisis could lead to the destructible of the stalls political status in the country.Malaysia now days have lists of political parties that have the same aim which is to rule Malaysia. On the other hand, economic crisis is one of the crimp to these political parties to rule the country or level off to the dominant political party such as UMNO. When the Asian monetary crisis 1997 hit Malaysia, the impact was traumatic. There was economic and political turmoil. The stock market, the nones and the property market nearly collapsed. That in turn touch on the overall economy.UMNO, the dominant political party in the command alliance, experienced political turbulence when its charismatic deputy president, Anwar Ibrahim, was expelled from the party when he disagreed with the then president, Mahathir Mohamad, over, among other things, Mahathirs rejection of loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Yet, Malaysia was not that badly affected as compared to some of its neighbors. It did not experience the extent of the socio-political distress as occurred in Indonesia where the rioting that broke out ultimately led to the override of Suharto.Nor was its economic sovereignty that deeply compromised as happened in Indonesia and Thailand when both countries were forced to accept the conditions imposed by the IMF for the acceptance of their loans. Besides, there is a major(ip) consideration of top dogs is the view purported by some quar ters that Dr. Mahathir has overstayed his tenure and that heir apparent Anwar would have been the right successor of a more liberalist Malaysia. The headsprings being around at that time is does it true that Anwar rejection is the consequences of he brings the economic down end point in Malaysia and idea in conserving loan from IMF or because Dr.Mahathir is feeling discomfort or unsecure due to the trusts and confident level of the people is falling down? This questions has delivered main elements of events of the recent two years is that by chance what transpired between Mahathir and Anwar climaxed as a second battle royale in Malaysias political history. There is more than a hint that underneath it all was a political contestation fought with intense intrigue and complexity one reflection observes that the Anwar group (some call it the Anwaristas, as opposed to the Mahathirists) had indeed been conspiring to satisfy the mantle of power by contrived means.Accordingly, it was a plot overt in time by Dr. Mahathirs forces. But yet, to suggest a real political division between Mahathirists and Anwaristas in the Malaysian political scenario is too neat an explanation of reality, and certainly these inchoate groupings are not mutually exclusive. As may be expected, there are alike the fence-sitters. As we noticed, Anwar expels is due to the economic crisis. But if we storming deeper, the cosmos of opposition of the control parties in Malaysia (Barisan Rakyat), namely Parti Keadilan Rakyat.Parti Keadilan Rakyat is formed in 2003 by a nuclear fusion of theNational Justice Partyand the olderMalaysian Peoples Party. Keadilan was led by DrWan Azizah Wan Ismail ( Anwars wife)and increased its parliamentary representation from 1 seat to 31 seats in theMalaysian general election, 2008until the five-year political ban imposed on former Deputy Prime pastorAnwar Ibrahimwas lifted on 14 April 2008. Here we can see the existence of one more political party in Malaysi a due to economic crisis. Anwar Ibrahim has been expels from the party and he form another party through his wife in the period of he was arrested in jail.Through this brings up another question to Malaysian. Whether Parti Keadilan Rakyat is really stand up on representing the public fate and rights? Or else, is just because of Anwars agenda to be the Prime Minister is failed because he was expelled from being Deputy Prime Minister by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad. Then he forms up his own political party? No matter what the question is, we can see that the existence of Parti Keadilan Rakyat giving a huge impact on the political environment in Malaysia. Large portion of confederation putting their trusts on Keadilan Rakyat and this is the warning and a big challenge to the disposal Malaysia in uling the country very well. The Malaysia government, Barisan Nasional is doing their best to society because they believe that Keadilan Rakyat have their own strength and ability in overcoming the g overnment. In conclusion, economic crisis brings up too many negative impacts towards our politics in Malaysia such as expellation of Anwar Ibrahim, unstable of ruling political party Barisan Nasional, the disunity of public trusts in ruling political party due to lost in trust of the attraction on that time.However, the existence of main opposition party Parti Keadilan Rakyat brings a very great impact to government on how they rule the country due to the possibility and ability of Parti Keadilan Rakyat to gain the public trusts. Thus, economic down term really brings a negative impact toward Malaysia in short run, scarcely however the subject brings a cause of positive impact toward Malaysia political environment in long term.