Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 2

Rhetorical Analysis - Essay idealHalf of the participants were told to leave their electronic mail alerts on while the other half were told only to check their emails tether times daily. After a week the participants who checked email ofttimes were told to check only deuce-ace times while the other group was told to check frequently. All the other factors remained constant. They observed that the participants were more hard-pressed when they were told to check their emails more frequently.Evidently, the authors aim at proving that frequent viewing on ones email might not be healthy, however at that same time warns that it might not be an easy task. The article begins with the questions, Is email overload, bad for you?. This question is used at the beginning of the article with the bushel reason of making sure that the readers have the question in mind as they go through with(predicate) the rest of the article. It is like a way through which the writers notify the readers of t he article exactly what the article is outlet to cover. The writers proceed by admitting that the question is rather a tricky question given the fact that there have been both sides of the argument, with both sides being keen on the evidence that they give for their assertion. The use of an example, in the first paragraph helps in giving more light on the exact possible consequences of frequently reading emails.Kuslev and Dunn choose to sue experimental evidence to prove their case. done the case study discussed in the article, Kostadin Kuslev and Elizabeth Dunn are trying to prove to their readers that their assertion is not based on some assumption but some fact that can be proved. The practical scenarios tend to attract the attention of the audience by letting them know that the argument that frequent email reading can actually lead to stress. Through the presented case study, the authors are able to bring their audience closer to accepting their argument. Despite the fact tha t the